More Tags

Subscribe to Email Updates

Popular Stories

MAP Network Exchange Launches in partnership with PULSE
What Consumers Should Know About the Credit Card Competition Act
Using AI to Detect Fraudulent Transactions could be Powerful
FedNow: Changing the Game for Real-Time Payments
First-Party Fraud - The Not So Friendly Fraud Reality
Written by Cyndie Martini
on December 14, 2021

Yet another crypto exchange has been hacked. With as much attention as crypto has gotten in recent years, you'd think there might be more regulatory scrutiny on the industry. That's simply not the case. Crypto exchanges are still the wild west.

The latest exchange hack victim is Bitmart, which is not a US exchange like Coinbase or Robinhood. Bitmart is based in Grand Cayman, Midland, Cayman Islands. So far, virtually all crypto exchange hacks are from non-US crypto exchanges.

We keep discussing crypto hacks to show the glaring differences between traditional bank and credit union security and payment methods (i.e., debit and credit cards) vs. crypto exchanges. Imagine if a bank would have gotten robbed or hacked, and the only sign of it was a tweet from the bank saying how much was stolen — no official press release.

Well, that's exactly what Bitmart did. On Dec 4, they announced, via a tweet, that $150 million was stolen from the exchange. Nothing about it on their website, even today. A security firm later said the amount was $196 million.

On the day of the hack, Bitmart restricted all deposits and withdrawals. On Dec 5, it held an AMA about the incident on Telegram. At close to midnight on Dec 7, Bitmart announced on Twitter that deposits and withdrawals had resumed. Still nothing about the incident on the website.

For four days, customers could not deposit or withdraw their funds. Bitmart did make people whole on their losses and required all deposit addresses to be changed. This was no doubt an extremely painful experience for customers.

Remember that funds or cryptocurrencies held on a crypto exchange have no FDIC protection. For these non-US crypto exchanges, there's also little to no regulation.

Customers are truly taking a lot of risk with these exchanges, whether they know it or not. The risk isn't reduced even for DiFi exchanges that claim to use savings accounts (via stable coins). The exchange can still be hacked, and the stablecoin can go to zero.


Let Us Know What You Thought about this Post.

Put your Comment Below.

You may also like:


Lack of Perspective for Crypto Regulation Leaves Room for Improvement

Unlike financial institutions, crypto isn't heavily regulated. Many US crypto firms only need to acquire a license to op...

Credit Unions Cryptocurrency

Crypto Services for Credit Unions

Should credit unions consider offering cryptocurrency-related services? Maybe the better question is, why not? Banks are...


Crypto-as-a-Service (CaaS)

Providing cryptocurrency-related products and services to your customers is a complex task. For credit unions that have ...